|
|
Hot water to sterilize nursery pots and trays |
|
|
Wet
heat treatment provides the best alternative to methyl bromide
for sterilizing plastic pots and containers in plant
nurseries, a study by Horticultural Development Company, the
United Kingdom, has found. Scientists found that wet heat
treatment (via a hot water bath) proved to be the most
effective method for controlling the test organisms, which
included two fungi Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium intermedium,
the seeds of weeds hairy bittercress and pearlwort, bud and
leaf nematodes, and western flower thrips.
Control was achieved with minimal risk of carry-over when pots
were exposed to 10 minutes wet heat treatment at 60C. The
report also states other nursery material such as capillary
matting can also be treated this way. Contact: Horticultural
Development Company, Bradbourne House, East Malling, Kent
ME19 6DZ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (1732) 848383; Fax: +44
(1732) 848498; E-mail: hdc@hdc.org.uk.
Source:
www.hortweek.com
|
|
|
|
|
Green alternatives to chemical pesticides |
|
Root-knot
nematodes are parasitic, microscopic and omnipresent worms
that cause considerable damage to horticultural and field
crops in sub-tropical regions, resulting in significant
financial losses to growers and gardeners. Until recently,
fumigation of the soil with methyl bromide (MBr) before
planting was the primary method for controlling root-knot
nematodes in valuable vegetable crops. However, since the
discovery that it has severe negative effects on the
stratospheric ozone layer, the use of MBr has been phased
out in the United States.
To combat parasites like root-knot nematodes without the use
of chemical pesticides, scientists are focusing more
research on developing new, parasite-resistant varieties of
vegetables. Dr. Judy Thies, a research plant pathologist at
the United States Department of Agricultures Agricultural
Research Service, was part of a research team that developed
the Charleston Belle variety of bell pepper, the first
nematode-resistant bell pepper. Dr. Thies and her colleagues
tested the stability of two types of bell peppers
Charleston Belle and Carolina Wonder, the only
nematode-resistant varieties available to commercial growers
and home gardeners. They tested the peppers for resistance
to nematodes in sub-tropical climates to determine if the
cultivars were stable when grown in Florida under high soil
temperatures.
The study results showed that nematode-resistant varieties
such as Charleston Belle and Carolina Wonder are viable
alternatives to MBr for managing southern root-knot nematode
in bell pepper in sub-tropical environments. Contact: Mr.
Michael Neff, American Society for Horticultural Science,
113 South West Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314-2851,
United States of America. Tel: +1 (703) 836 4606; Fax: +1
(703) 836 2024; E-mail: mwneff@ashs.org.
Source:
www.eurekalert.org
|
|
|
|
|
Usage and results update on iodomethane |
|
Arysta LifeScience, the United States, registered its
iodomethane product Midas soil fumigant with the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in October 2007,
and received approval for the pre-plant uses of Midas on:
strawberries; tomatoes; peppers; field-grown ornamentals
(including turf); tree fruit, nuts and vines; and nurseries
(strawberry, conifer tree and vine).
Several novel requirements and practices have been implemented
during the registration and commercial phase-in with uses for
Midas. Requirements such as the Midas Qualified Applicator
Training Programme, implementation of national buffer zones
utilizing specific buffer zone credits, and the use of
personal protective equipment. On-going practices include the
use of a selection of highly retentive films (VIF, SIF, TIF,
etc.) as an option to reduce rates and buffer zones, updating
and modifying commercial application equipment for accurate
Midas applications.
Commercial applications are underway in key growing regions of
the United States, with positive results. Midas technical
feasibility in fields with a variety of pest pressure, as well
as various soil and moisture conditions has now been tested on
more than 3,000 acres. A wide variety of labelled crops has
been planted in soil treated with Midas. Commercial double
cropping conditions have been evaluated following Midas
applications. Results of commercial applications indicate that
economic returns for crops planted into soil treated with
Midas are cost-effective based on rates and cost per acre.
Source:
www.mbao.org |
|
|
|
|
Researchers seek replant disease solutions |
|
GPS-guided, shank-applied, spot
treatments with fumigants are among experiments by the
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the
University of California Davis (UCD) scientists seeking
solutions to long-standing problems with replant disease in
almond and stone fruit orchards. Without soil fumigation
and/or other steps before planting, severe Prunus replant
disease (PRD) kills or prevents growth in about half of
replacement almond or stone fruit trees in California.
PRD is associated with a complex including soil conditions,
fungi, bacteria and moulds from the preceding crop.
Parasitic nematodes can also play a role. We sometimes find
aggressive pathogens such as Armillaria, Phytophthora or
Verticillium, said Dr. Greg Browne, a USDA plant
pathologist at UCD, who leads the Pacific Area-Wide Pest
Management Programme for Integrated Methyl Bromide
Alternatives. Dr. Brownes team is probing several practices
to find alternatives in view of regulations on methyl
bromide (MBr), Telone formulations and other fumigants.
Results, based on tree growth indicated by trunk diameter,
of research in orchards have revealed findings that may
contribute to solutions, including:
Chloropicrin and mixtures of it and iodomethane, Telone or
MBr are more effective than the latter three alone.
Short-term rotations with Sudan grass, wheat followed by
mustard, or a single fallow season can reduce effects of PRD.
Over- or under-irrigating almond trees replanted without
pre-plant soil fumigation after removal of almond on peach
rootstock can worsen PRD.
GPS-controlled shank treatments applied to tree sites
before planting with chloropicrin/Telone, or drip
irrigation-applied spot treatments with a formulation of the
two chemicals, appear nearly as effective as strip or
broadcast treatments.
The spot-fumigation system, developed by Prof. Shrini
Upadhyaya, UCD Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Department, in co-operation with TriCal Inc. is basically a
conventional shank-rig mounted on a tractor. It is
controlled by a GPS computer for automatic and precise
injection of fumigant in a prescribed grid of rectangular
areas where trees will be planted. The method saves
considerable material compared with broadcast application.
Source:
www.westernfarmpress.com |
|
|
|
|
Efficacy of ethanedinitrile against cereal pathogens |
|
Scientists from
CSIRO Entomology of Australia and Agricultural Research
Service of the United States Department of Agriculture have
jointly assessed the efficacy of ethanedinitrile (EDN) at low
temperatures (3-22C) against pathogens in cereal feed
grains. EDN, patented by CSIRO as a new fumigant against
insects and micro-organisms, is being investigated by CSIRO
Australia as an alternative to methyl bromide (MBr) for a
range of other uses, including soil and timber fumigation.
The study reported preliminary assessment of efficacy at low
temperatures against target pathogens including Tilletia
indica Mitra, Peronosclerospora sorghi (sorghum downy
mildew), Tilletia controversa Khn (dwarf bunt) and Ustilago
maydis (DC) Corda (boil smut). EDN has a threshold limit
value (TLV) of 10 ppm, which compares favourably with 5 ppm
for MBr. Treatments included: (1) naked spores; (2) bunted
seed, when present as a propagule in the pathogen life
cycle; and (3) spores dusted on maize.
EDN-treated material and untreated control spores of T.
indica, T. controversa and U. maydis were seeded onto
water-agar medium to assess viability based on spore
germination. As oospores of S. sorghi germinate poorly on
artificial medium, a bioassay on susceptible plants was
used. Treated oospores were mixed into the upper layer of
soil in a plastic pot and planted with seeds of a highly
susceptible sorghum cultivar, and placed in a growth chamber
for disease development.
In general, though data indicate EDN was more toxic at
higher temperatures, good control was obtained at the lowest
temperature of 3C. Overall, T. indica, with its large
teliospore, was the most tolerant of the smut fungi. Naked
teliospores were more easily controlled than spores still
contained within the fungal structure of T. indica and T.
controversa. All three smut species treated were controlled
to a high level at all temperatures and at dosages likely to
be useful in treatment schedules. No vital stains were shown
to be effective with oospores of P. sorghi, which could be
because of annual dormancy of the oospores. Contact: Mr. J.
E. van Someren Graver, CSIRO Entomology, G.P.O. Box 1700,
Canberra, ACT 2615, Australia.
Source:
www.mbao.org
|
|
|
|
|
Soil disinfestation with steam and solarization |
|
Researchers at
the University of California Davis, the United States,
studied the efficacy of a soil disinfestation system
comprising steam treatment and solarization as a methyl
bromide (MBr) alternative for field-grown cut flowers and
strawberry. High energy costs and lack of appropriate steam
applicators have limited the use of steam in commercial
fields. Injecting steam into finished plant beds with a
mobile steam generator under clear polyethylene mulch would
allow steam to supplement solarization as needed. The
research aim was to develop an economical combined
solarization and steam heat, soil disinfestation system.
Pathogen (Verticillium sp.) and weed seed (common chickweed,
knotweed, purslane, little mallow and yellow nutsedge)
samples were first installed in the planting beds. Viability
of the weed propagules was determined using tetrazolium
tests. Treatments included drip application of MBr +
chloropicrin (MBrPic, 67:33) at 350 lb/acre, control (no
MBrPic, solarization or steam), solarization alone, steam
alone, and steam + solarization. For steam + solarization
treatments, beds were solarized before and after steam
application. For steam treatments, steam was injected to
raise the bed temperature to 70C for 30 min.
Solarization alone did not have the same efficacy as MBrPic.
Steam, with or without solarization, resulted in weed
control similar to MBrPic. Peak temperatures of >78C in the
steam treatments did eliminate weeds as well as MBrPic.
Source:
www.mbao.org
|
|
|
|
|